Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 01:21

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What are some of your shocking stories?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
A fireball over desert mountains photo of the day for May 30, 2025 - Space
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Samsung Nears Wide-Ranging Deal With Perplexity for AI Features - Bloomberg.com
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
How has Meghan Markle’s style evolved from her Hollywood days to her life as a Duchess?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Scientists investigate parasite's lifecycle to combat deadly Chagas disease - Phys.org
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sega Throws Shade At Mario Kart While Showing Off Sonic Racing: Crossworlds - Kotaku
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
USMNT vs. Trinidad and Tobago: Starting XI & Lineup Notes - US Soccer